Health updates
Sickness and disease since 2021
Dear Church Leaders
In mid-March, I put out this post, which has been one of the most read:
As the picture associated with the article makes clear, I did a subsequent update. And I have since done several more.
One becomes two
But given that the updates have made the above post rather longer than I had originally intended, I thought it made sense to divide — or multiply — the whole thing into two separate parts:
the original post (as linked above), along with some of the most directly relevant updates, including the 18th April 2024 debate on excess deaths co-sponsored by MPs Andrew Bridgen and Neale Hanvey
this follow-on post, related to various developments in health outcomes
I plan to update both posts as events unfold.
The elephant in the room
Although there have been reports of increased levels of sickness and disease in the mainstream media, there has been relatively little mention of a certain novel medical intervention that was rolled out across populations, including the young, in many Western countries in 2021.
Some of the information in the main body of this post (below) makes no mention of the covid injections. Some does. I see it as my role to present some of the evidence and to leave readers to draw their own conclusions in relation to the extent of the effects of the injections (a word which I have long maintained provides a rather more accurate description than “vaccines”).
But I will say that I think we should be increasingly suspicious of anyone who discusses the recent rise in sickness and disease — which in many cases started in 2021 — without even mentioning that covid injections might be a contributory factor.
Why do I say this?1 Not least because of…
Searching Google Scholar
For context, I invite readers to try searching Google Scholar for “covid vaccination XXX”, where XXX is (for example):
Or if you prefer more technical terms, try (for example):
And keep scrolling and clicking through the results. There are literally thousands of papers. And of course only a relatively small proportion of cases end up being reported in the scientific literature.
By way of an example, here is a screenshot of page 10 for the results where XXX = heart:
By the way, myocarditis — inflammation of heart muscle — is a serious condition. Concerns were first raised about it in 2021. It appears that problems began with the rollout of the covid injections, something which is consistent e.g. with this GoogleTrends profile:
And concerns continue to grow.
[Update: This Scientific Publications Directory at react19.org — “a collection of peer reviewed case reports and studies citing adverse effects post covid vaccination” — features 3580 entries.]
Meanwhile, the mainstream media seems to be trying to convince us that sudden deaths in the young are somehow normal, and due to almost anything but the elephant. In the US — one of only two countries allowing direct (rather than indirect) pharma advertising — there has even been an advert to normalise myocarditis in children.
Not so rare
More broadly, if you think some of the reports concern rare diseases, you are quite right. But do bear in mind that, according to the UK government:
Although rare diseases are individually rare they are collectively common, with 1 in 17 people being affected by a rare disease at some point in their lifetime. In the UK this amounts to over 3.5 million people
And, more importantly, that it was plain to anyone looking carefully at the data in 2021 that there was good evidence that adverse reactions — including death and serious injury — were relatively common.
And in 2022:
Researchers at Charité Berlin, Germany’s top hospital and one of Europe’s largest… announced a high rate of severe side effects lasting months or longer based on a survey of about 40,000 Germans… [estimating] 8 serious side effects per 1,000 vaccinated people (1 out of every 125)
Which is consistent with this report on Germany’s largest health insurer (and lots of other data from other countries, some of which is included below):
And how did the authorities respond? In the UK, they carried on pushing the injections on children and the young, and even on pregnant women. Aided and abetted by the NHS among others. At the time of writing, it’s still happening.
The dam begins to break?
Published on 3rd May 2024, this New York Times article is an apparent shift in how the mainstream media approach covid vaccine harms:
Sickness and disease
There follows a selection of various reports representing a very small fraction of the ever-growing body of material that could be cited.
“Britain faces worst sickness crisis since 1990s as millions quit workforce”
March 2024 article from The Telegraph (behind paywall):
The data is consistent with:
This analysis from diagnostic pathologist Dr Clare Craig who points out that “there are 800,000 more people in the UK who can’t work because of long-term sickness since the vaccine rollout”:
And this analysis from Phinance Technologies re UK Personal Independent Payments (welfare benefit):
And various other observations including:
The number of ambulance calls (p17 here):
Scottish mountain rescue callouts:
Similar patterns in other countries
This data from Australia (source):
This data from Sweden, where the covid restrictions were minimal (original sources for workforce and sick leave data at links):
This data from the US:
Analysis of UK Death and Disability Trends for Diseases of the Nervous System, Ages 15-49
From Phinance Technologies report published in February 2024:
Unexplained cardiac deaths in Germany
From April 2023: Safety of mRNA Vaccines Administered During the First Twenty-Four Months of the International COVID-19 Vaccination Program
In combination with anecdotal evidence, limitations of the safety trials, and the decreased lethality of new strains, our research demonstrates that the cost (both monetary and humanitarian) of vaccinating otherwise healthy people, and especially children, may outweigh the benefits.
Recent paper from Japan re “significant excess mortality” in cancer:
From April 2024: Increased Age-Adjusted Cancer Mortality After the Third mRNA-Lipid Nanoparticle Vaccine Dose During the COVID-19 Pandemic in Japan
No significant excess mortality was observed during the first year of the [covid] pandemic (2020). However, some excess cancer mortalities were observed in 2021 after mass vaccination with the first and second [covid] vaccine doses, and significant excess mortalities were observed for all cancers and some specific types of cancer (including ovarian cancer, leukemia, prostate cancer, lip/oral/pharyngeal cancer, pancreatic cancer, and breast cancer) after mass vaccination with the third dose in 2022.
Data for referrals for prostate cancer in Scotland can be found here…2
…along with this notice:
[Related update: World Council for Health summary article (11th May 2024) here]
This is consistent with what UK Professor of Oncology Angus Dalgleish has been warning about since late 2022:
See also e.g. video here (transcript) and articles here and here. But “all [Prof Dalgleish’s] efforts and approaches to the mainstream media on this subject [were] rejected”.
He continues to speak out though. Here he is in April 2024, explaining what is happening, including how doctors are being threatened and censored to discourage them from raising concerns:
Other doctors speaking out include pathologist Dr Ryan Cole (US), Dr Ute Kruger (Sweden), Prof Fukushima (Japan), Prof Gabriel Oon (Singapore) and Dr William Makis (Canada) who addresses Wikipedia’s “anti-vaccination myth” Turbo cancer article with links to 26 recent scientific papers.
A summary article can be found here:
Recent developments re dementia
See e.g. this from a Japanese neuroscientist:
Credible people were warning about such things in 2021. They were ridiculed. By “experts”. But there is now plenty of evidence of vaccine-induced cognitive impairment:
More broadly:
Recent article in Australian Journal of General Practice re mRNA vaccine harms
In relation to the above recent article, Malcolm Roberts, Senator for Queensland, highlights the following paragraphs:
Multiple studies have shown an increased risk of myocarditis after vaccination with mRNA encoding SARS-CoV-2 spike protein. mRNA vaccines can result in spike protein expression in muscle tissue, the lymphatic system, cardiomyocytes [heart muscle cells] and other cells after entry into the circulation. Recipients of two or more injections of the mRNA vaccines display a class switch to IgG4 antibodies. Abnormally high levels of IgG4 might cause autoimmune diseases, promote cancer growth, autoimmune myocarditis and other IgG4-related diseases (IgG4-RD) in susceptible individuals.
And:
There are clear implications for vaccine boosting where these and similar observations relating to COVID-19 vaccination and the incidence of long COVID-like symptoms are substantiated, adding further to public health officials’ concerns. Understanding the persistence of viral mRNA and viral protein and their cellular pathological effects after vaccination with and without infection is clearly required. Because COVID-19 vaccines were approved without long-term safety data and might cause immune dysfunction, it is perhaps premature to assume that past SARS-CoV-2 infection is the sole common factor in long COVID.
And:
There is concern that COVID-19 vaccination per se might contribute to long COVID, giving rise to the colloquial term ‘Long Vax(x)’. The spike protein of SARS-CoV-2 exhibits pathogenic characteristics and is a possible cause of post-acute sequelae after SARS-CoV-2 infection or COVID-19 vaccination.”
The above observations (and many others) are consistent with the discussion in this article from late 2022 by a medical whistleblower writing under a pseudonym:
In the context of the above, and of the excess deaths discussed in the article from which this one originated…
…Australian Senator Malcolm Roberts has recently described the situation as a crime scene.
He doesn’t mince his words:
It’s time to treat the zealots of the religion of mRNA as the maniacs they are. They played God and they harmed people. They killed tens of thousands of people [in Australia alone]
And grievously injured many more. Knowingly.
At a rate of around 1% serious injury, I wonder how many people in our own congregation are affected. (On the basis of the numbers alone, it’s highly unlikely to be zero.)
And when our church (and other churches) will begin to acknowledge what has happened:
Dear Church Leaders homepage (or via Substack, or e.g. DuckDuckGo, but not Google for some reason)
The Big Reveal — Christianity carefully considered (which can also be found via Substack, or e.g. DuckDuckGo, but not Google)
For what it’s worth, I should perhaps point out that, prior to 2020, I had accepted all the vaccines I had ever been offered, and for some years had even paid for an annual flu vaccine. I could reasonably have described myself as something of a vaccine evangelist.
No longer.
The push for covid injections woke me up. As I began to see the fraudulent tactics being used to promote the novel gene-based covid injections as “safe and effective vaccines”, and as I read more about past medical scandals, I began to wonder about vaccines more generally. I had previously trusted the authorities and not looked into the data. And when I did, I found various things that shocked and surprised me, among them that:
[i] in vaccine trials, a true placebo (e.g. saline, rather than another vaccine) is not often used for comparison, and there is a lack of long-term safety monitoring
[ii] some of the ingredients used in vaccines have not been robustly tested for long-term safety
[iii] historical records show that many nasty diseases were all-but-eliminated before the relevant vaccines became available (with the improvements in public health probably being due largely to advances in sanitation, living standards, and basic medical care)
[iv] there is a reluctance to do trials which could establish the extent to which the growing number of routine childhood vaccinations may be linked to chronic sickness
And so my whole outlook has changed. I no longer trust the authorities. I’d now be willing to pay not to have a flu vaccine! And I’d certainly recommend steering clear of the HPV vaccine. Moreover, I would now recommend that anyone contemplating any form of vaccination — for themselves or for their children or for anyone else, or even for their pets! — looks carefully into the matter first. Not least in terms of being acquainted with both sides of the argument, I would recommend e.g. safertowait.com (whose homepage is curiously difficult to find on mainstream search engines…). And particularly the book Turtles All The Way Down, the foreword, introduction and first chapter of which can be found here.
Interestingly, I have encountered many other people — many of them credible and experienced doctors and scientists — who say very similar things to what I have written above.
Here is a two-minute clip of one of America’s top cardiologists explaining why the World Council for Health has called for a complete moratorium on childhood vaccines.
[Update: given the importance of the above, I have put out a separate post elaborating somewhat on the issues raised here.]
Select “Cancer first treatments” under the Cancer tab, and then cancer type