In the context of Mothering Sunday
Women's health, basic medical ethics, and unborn children
Dear Church Leaders
I thought it worth writing to you in the context of the approach of Mothering Sunday. I should perhaps say at the outset that I write here with a heavy heart. And that this message is not an easy read.
As far as I can tell, it appears that there are major issues with women’s health that are going largely unreported by the mainstream media. If you doubt this, try e.g. searching Google Scholar for “covid vaccine menstruation” (and keep scrolling).
Such covid vaccine-related harms are not so surprising in the context e.g. of an early Pfizer rat pharmacokinetic study (looking at what the body does to a drug/vaccine) that showed that the vaccine lipid nanoparticles (LNPs) accumulate in the ovaries (see e.g. p45 of this Australian government document from 2021). The results of this study were known in 2021, which was when I first saw links to the original study circulating on independent media. And the outcome of that Pfizer study was hardly unpredictable. The likelihood of LNPs accumulating in the ovaries was known in the scientific literature long before 2020.
In the context of the above it is also unsurprising that there are many reports (from doctors, nurses and patients) of increased rates of miscarriage and stillbirth. This is consistent with official government data (where it is still being published), not least that showing markedly reduced birth rates. Including in Sweden, where covid restrictions were fairly minimal. There is of course a multitude of factors that contribute to birth rates, but it is notable that in several countries there was a marked reduction in early 2022, i.e. around 9 months after covid vaccines were first administered to women of childbearing age. At the very least, it might reasonably be thought that this merits further investigation. But I know of no official inquiries addressing the issues of potential covid vaccine harms to pregnant women and their unborn children.
I used the phrase "adverse events" earlier, but such a description does not really do justice to what for many women is grievous injury, and in some cases the loss of their baby. Moreover, and to compound the anguish, many women who have suffered from the effects of covid vaccination report being shunned by the healthcare system and gaslit by doctors and nurses. There is also the question of the extent to which the babies of covid-vaccinated mothers will be affected. And the matter of how covid vaccination might affect the fertility of women (and girls) who are yet to try to conceive. And not just in this generation (cf. e.g. diethylstilbestrol).
In my view it is diabolical that any health authority (and particularly the NHS and the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists) should recommend covid vaccines to pregnant women, and especially so given what we know now. Even if there were no apparent risks at all from the covid vaccines, and even if the vaccines did not involve the use of pseudo-mRNA, it would still be completely unethical to recommend them to pregnant women given the lack of long-term safety data. As a society it seems we have lost sight of basic medical ethics, and forgotten painful lessons learned from past mistakes. More broadly, it pains me that so few people (and so few Christians) seem interested in speaking up on behalf of unborn children.
As to Mothering Sunday, I am not necessarily expecting anyone to say anything from the front of church that is expressly related to the above. But you might want to bear it in mind when considering what is going to be said.
Updated June 2024:
For further context, this 2022 article (and this 2024 follow-up) from a medical whistleblower writing under a pseudonym; plus related recent developments:
The MHRA still won’t release critical data on vaccinated pregnant women. Why might that be…?
Meanwhile the UK Government has given “Regulatory approval of Pfizer/BioNTech vaccine for COVID-19” for infants and children of 6 months to 4 years of age — “a primary course of 3 doses (0.2 mL each)” (announced in March 2024; can anyone still believe that something like this is a case of “mistakes being made”?):
For context here, this two-part article, from a medical whistleblower writing under a pseudonym, is fairly long but perhaps one of the most important out there (and provides some context for the GileadGate article mentioned above):
Dear Church Leaders homepage (or search Substack for “Dear Church Leaders”)
The Big Reveal — Christianity carefully considered (click “No thanks” unless you want to subscribe for occasional updates)